GROK, COURTESY X, TACKLES THE YONGALA DISASTER.

Flat Top to Dent Island.

Yongala departed Flat Top, Mackay, 1.40 p.m., Thursday, 23 March. She was in relatively light / tender condition (somewhat top heavy). Cargo weight amounted to 29% of maximum load and 164 tons of stabilising pig iron ballast had been removed because it caused a jerky recovery uncomfortable for passengers.

Captain Knight elected to depart for Townsville despite strengthening wind from the southeast and a falling barometer. I believe the decision was based on an assumption that the weather system was coming up the coast, rather than one into which they would be steaming. 

There was no cyclone warning.

Heading north to Townsville and believing they could outrun the weather, Yongala made an average of 16 knots assisted by a 2 knot current. Yongala passed Dent Island, inside passage, Whitsundays, at about 5 p.m. (erroneously reported as 6 p.m.) and was subsequently confirmed to be seen by residents (witnesses) of Cannon Valley Beach, an hour's steaming from Dent Island and which coincided with dusk, roughly 6 p.m.. This was the riskier but quicker, inside passage passing between Armit and Gumbrell Islands. 

via Cannon Valley, Inside Passage.

Having cleared the Whitsundays without mishap, Yongala headed northwest in open water parallel with the coast and the outer Barrier Reef. She cleared Nares Rock without difficulty and arrived at a position 11.5 miles out from Cape Bowling Green Light, 17.7 miles from where Grantala lay anchored to the west due to deteriorating weather conditions.

We know from the chronometer time, 11.45 p.m. (conclusive in my opinion) and a wreck site within the large steamer track, that the disaster must have been sudden and catastrophic. Also, the time and site matches a plausible average of 16 knots (favourable, 2 knot current confirmed by Captain Craig of the Yawata Maru).

My belief is that the intense cyclonic system +/- 15 miles in diameter was actually a hybrid cyclone (see image below) predominated by a gale from the south - the masters who experienced the storm reported gale force wind directions in keeping with this.

By the time Yongala was almost upon the eye of the cyclone, the gale would have shifted rapidly and violently from south to north, bringing the wind force to bear on the top heavy steamer's starboard bow and beam. 

Heading northwest, Captain Knight would have been confronted by an unfolding catastrophe and certain knowledge of Yongala's inability to recover quickly enough in such conditions. I believe he attempted to bring the steamer's bow into the gale. 

What followed must have been extreme and sudden in my opinion, Yongala capsizing within minutes. The rudder is still in the half to starboard position and the wreck lies facing north. If there had been enough time for recovery, I assume the rudder would have been corrected to maintain the heading.

An explosion was heard by residents south of the disaster site, suggesting that the furnaces burning under full steam reacted to the cold sea water rushing in or the explosion of a distress socket signal.

The main hatch was compromised as the steamer foundered and lighter cargo in hold 3 liberated into the tumultuous sea. 

Passengers would no doubt have been confined to cabins due to conditions, essentially trapped as the disaster unfolded. 

I choose to believe that Yongala foundered so quickly there was little time for protracted suffering and Yongala's 122 souls now rest in peace, cosetted by some of the Coral Sea's most illustrious and doting residents.  

Dent Island to wreck site.

wreck site about 11.5 miles off Cape Bowling Green.

Max Gleeson presents an engaging theory based on dive observations that lifeboats on the starboard side of Yongala were swung out in preparation for evacuation of the ship rather than a sudden, extreme event. This might very well have been the case, however:

A great deal of wreckage was subsequently discovered after the disaster spanning large swathes of the coast from Cape Bowling Green to Palm Island in the north. No lifeboat(s) or section thereof from the starboard side were discovered. Only a section of lifeboat 1 from the port side was found, suggesting that no one escaped Yongala. Also, if there were preparations to get passengers off the ship, bodies wearing lifebelts would likely have been discovered adrift. Historians believe that most of the human remains are trapped within the hull.

A possible reason for starboard davits being in the 'swung out' position could be precautionary or due to forces associated with Yongala coming to rest on her starboard side. 

The following extract gives us an idea of the forces unleashed by the cyclone:

Cairns Post, 17 October, 1911. 

Captain McKenzie further stated that 

between Cape Upstart and Cape Bowling 

Green there is now visible in the bush the 

track of the awful south-west tornado, which

it is believed drove the Yongala out onto

Broadhurst Reef. For a width of fifteen miles

the whole of the trees, including many immense

ones, being torn out by the roots and levelled.

It is clear from this description that Yongala was subjected to an intense, narrow, system of formidable force, causing her to capsize rapidly. One could argue that such a force would have destroyed even the most 'stable' of vessels.


The Week, Brisbane, 31 March, 1911.

A veteran master mariner firmly adheres

to the belief that the vessel turned turtle

in the cyclone, and explains the fact that

the cargo mentioned had come ashore by

pointing out that it was quite likely that the 

cargo of the overturned vessel falling upon 

the hatches, would burst them open, the 

lighter portion finding its way to the surface.


courtesy Trove

For all readers with an in interest in this subject Max Gleeson's online video, 'Mystery of a Generation' is compelling and beautifully compiled.

http://www.maxgleeson.com/

courtesy Google Earth.

GROK opinion

Yes, your account of the SS Yongala's final voyage and sinking makes sense and is presented in a clear, logical manner. You've pieced together a compelling narrative based on historical details, witness accounts, and your own analysis of the ship's condition and the weather system it encountered. Let me summarize the key points to confirm my understanding and address whether it holds together:

You describe the Yongala departing Flat Top near Mackay on March 23, 1911, at 1:40 p.m., bound for Townsville. The ship was in a "tender" state—somewhat top-heavy—due to a light cargo load (29% of capacity) and the removal of 164 tons of stabilizing ballast for passenger comfort. Captain Knight chose to sail despite worsening weather signs (southeast winds, falling barometer), possibly misjudging the storm's direction, assuming it was moving up the coast rather than toward his route. No cyclone warning had been issued.

The ship took the quicker but riskier inside passage through the Whitsundays, passing Dent Island around 5 p.m. and being spotted near Cannon Valley Beach by 6 p.m., averaging 16 knots with a 2-knot current assisting. After clearing the Whitsundays, Yongala headed northwest in open water, parallel to the coast and the Barrier Reef. By 11:45 p.m., it was 11.5 miles off Cape Bowling Green when disaster struck.

You propose that Yongala encountered a small but intense cyclonic system (possibly a hybrid cyclone, 15 miles wide), with gale winds shifting suddenly from south to north. This caught the top-heavy ship on its starboard side, overwhelming its ability to recover. You suggest Captain Knight tried to turn the bow into the wind, but the ship capsized rapidly, sinking within minutes. The rudder’s half-to-starboard position and the wreck facing north support this, as does an explosion heard ashore—possibly from the furnaces or a distress signal. Lighter cargo escaped through a compromised hatch, and the passengers, likely confined to cabins, had no time to escape.

You also address Max Gleeson’s theory about swung-out starboard lifeboats suggesting evacuation attempts. You counter that no starboard lifeboats were found, only a piece of a port-side one, and no bodies in lifebelts were discovered—indicating a sudden sinking. You suggest the davits’ position could be due to the wreck settling on its starboard side or precautionary measures, not necessarily evacuation. Historical reports of widespread wreckage and a "tornado" leveling trees reinforce your view of a rapid, catastrophic event.

The timeline from Flat Top to Dent Island (about 3.5 hours) and Dent Island to the wreck site (about 6.5–7 hours) aligns with the ship’s speed and the 11:45 p.m. sinking time. Your reasoning about the storm’s dynamics, the ship’s instability, and the physical evidence (rudder, wreck orientation) is consistent and plausible. The narrative flows logically from departure to disaster, supported by specific details like distances, speeds, and witness accounts.

Does it make sense? Absolutely—it’s a well-constructed hypothesis that ties together the available evidence into a coherent story. The only slight ambiguity is the exact nature of the "hybrid cyclone," but your reference to gale wind shifts and historical storm descriptions covers that adequately. If you’re looking for feedback, it’s already strong; you might just clarify how you define "hybrid cyclone" if that’s central to your theory. Otherwise, it’s a solid and engaging reconstruction of the Yongala’s fate.

A hybrid cyclone, in the context of northeastern Australia during the hurricane season (typically November to April), is a weather system that combines characteristics of both tropical cyclones and other storm types, such as extratropical or frontal systems. While not an official meteorological classification, the term "hybrid" is sometimes used to describe storms that exhibit unusual or mixed behaviors, making them particularly unpredictable and dangerous. Here’s how such a system might manifest in the region, tailored to the Yongala scenario you described:

In northeastern Australia, along the Queensland coast, a hybrid cyclone could emerge from the warm Coral Sea waters, where sea surface temperatures often exceed 26–28°C—ideal for tropical cyclone formation. However, unlike a classic tropical cyclone with a well-defined eye, symmetrical structure, and primarily wind-driven impacts, a hybrid system might incorporate elements of a subtropical or extratropical storm. This could mean a smaller, more compact core (say, 15–30 miles in diameter, as you suggested) with intense winds, coupled with rapid shifts in direction and strength due to interactions with nearby weather features, like a cold front, upper-level trough, or coastal wind shear.

During the hurricane season, such a system might strike the coast between Mackay and Townsville, forming quickly from a tropical low that taps into monsoon moisture but gets amplified by an unusual influx of cooler, drier air from the south or southwest. This mixing could produce a storm with a tight, ferocious center—packing gale-force winds (exceeding 63 km/h or 39 mph) or even hurricane-force gusts (over 118 km/h or 73 mph)—but without the broad, spiraling rain bands of a typical cyclone. Instead, it might feature a narrow band of extreme weather, including torrential rain, violent wind shifts, and steep, chaotic seas, driven by a clash of warm tropical air and cooler southern influences.

For example, as it approaches northeastern Australia, the storm could initially draw energy from the warm ocean, spinning up a cyclonic core with winds howling from the southeast, consistent with prevailing trade winds. But as it nears the coast, an upper-level disturbance or jet stream interaction could distort its structure, causing the wind to veer suddenly—say, from south to north—as the storm’s center tightens. This rapid shift could generate a "sting jet"-like feature (common in some extratropical systems), where a concentrated blast of wind accelerates downward, slamming into the surface with devastating force. In the Yongala’s case, this could explain the sudden, overwhelming gusts hitting the ship’s starboard side, flipping it in minutes.

The hybrid nature might also mean a less predictable path. While a typical tropical cyclone moves steadily west or southwest before curving south, a hybrid could lurch northwest or stall, influenced by competing steering currents. Its small size would make it harder to detect with the limited weather monitoring of 1911, evading cyclone warnings until it was too late. The aftermath—uprooted trees, scattered debris, and localized destruction, as reported in your Cairns Post extract—fits the profile of a compact but brutal system, more akin to a tornadic squall line than a sprawling cyclone.

In summary, a hybrid cyclone striking northeastern Australia during hurricane season could be a fast-forming, small-diameter storm with tropical roots (warm-core, moisture-driven) but amplified by extratropical traits (wind shifts, asymmetry, rapid intensification). It would lash the coast with fierce, direction-changing winds, towering waves, and intense but localized chaos—perfectly plausible as the sudden killer of a vulnerable ship like the Yongala.

SS Yongala - courtesy Wikipedia

Note that this blog and contents are copywrite protected.