Thursday, 29 September 2016

THE MARINE INQUIRY.

Unique ID:21077
Description:BOT Wreck Report for 'Yongala', 1911
Creator:Board of Trade
Date:1911
Copyright:Out of copyright
Partner:SCC Libraries
Partner ID:Unknown
Transcription (No. 7477.)

" YONGALA " (S.S.).

REPORT of an Inquiry held by the Marine Board of Queensland into the circumstances attending the loss of the s.s. " YONGALA," of Adelaide, on or about the 23rd day of March, 1911, between Mackay and Townsville.

In complying with the request of the Hon. the Treasurer for immediate steps to be taken to hold a full inquiry, under the provisions of " The Navigation Act of 1876," into the circumstances connected with the loss of the s.s. "Yongala," on or about the night of the 23rd March, 1911, between Mackay and Townsville, the Board fully realise the difficulty inseparable from the task assigned to them, inasmuch as, while partaking to some extent of the nature of the ordinary inquiry into a marine disaster, the cause of which, by personal evidence and attendant circumstances, is usually ascertainable, its identity with such is impaired in this case by the fact that to enable them to arrive at a definite finding no such testimony is available, and it would therefore appear to the Board that, in order to account for the total disappearance of the ill-fated vessel with all on board, the inquiry will chiefly be in the direction of the ship's stability, equipment, and seaworthiness, together with the question of Captain Knight's carefulness and general efficiency as a shipmaster.

Mr. J. T. O'Shea, of Messrs. O'Shea and O'Shea, solicitors, appeared on behalf of the Adelaide Steamship Company. Having heard the evidence of Mr. E. Northcote (the general manager), Mr. E. B. Wareham (the Queensland inspector and attorney), Mr. H. Adamson (the superintending engineer), and C. Hansen (the superintendent stevedore), of the Adelaide Steamship Company; Captain J. Sim (master), W. K. Saunders (mate), and F. K. Blown (chief engineer), of the s.s. "Grantala "; Captain C. MacKenzie (master) of the s.s. " Wollowra," and Mr. A. McG. Leslie, who have for various periods served in the " Yongala "; Captains Hurford of the " Bombala," Smith of the " Cooma," Sharland of the "Warrego," Dibble, late of the Howard Smith Company; Binstead, Torres Strait Pilot; Rothwell, who searched for the wreck in the " Porpoise "; Mr. Bond, the Divisional Officer of the Meteorological Bureau of Queensland; the Shipping Inspector and Assistant Shipping Inspector of Brisbane; the Board find that the s.s. " Yongala," Official Number 118332, registered in Adelaide, Captain William Knight, master, and owned by the Adelaide Steamship Company, Limited, was on a voyage from Melbourne to Cairns, via ports.

In view of certain rumours being in circulation reflecting on the ship's stability, the Board invited, through the Press, persons desirous of giving evidence to attend the inquiry, which notice, however, met with no response.

Stability. 

The " Yongala " was a steel screw steamer of 3,664 tons gross and 1,825 net; length, 350 feet; breadth, 45·2 feet; depth, 27·2 feet; built under special survey in 1903 by Messrs. Armstrong, Whitworth, and Co., Newcastle-on-Tyne, from specifications supplied by the Adelaide Steamship Company. Mr. Adamson, the company's superintendent engineer, supervised her building, and gave in evidence that the that the specifications provided that:


"After the vessel is completed, her centre of gravity is to be ascertained experimentally by inclining her, and curves of stability are to be calculated up to 90 degrees inclination at intervals of not more than 10 degrees and for five different conditions of loading, to be specified by the company". "Complete diagrams of results are to be prepared and supplied to the company". "The inclining experiments are to be performed at the expense of the builders", "and in the presence and to the satisfaction of inspectors appointed by the company to watch the experiments."

These tests were strictly carried out in his presence. Mr. Adamson also stated that the machinery, especially crank shaft and shafting, were 20 to 25 per cent. stronger than Lloyd's requirements.
If further confirmation of the ship's stability and seaworthiness be required, it is to be found in the satisfactory career of the vessel of over seven years' continuous running on the coast of Australia, four of which were in the West Australian trade, where the return journey was always made without cargo in all weathers, without accident.

In regard to pig-iron ballast being placed in the vessel whilst in the West Australian trade, and subsequently removed when the ship was transferred to the Queensland trade, it was explained by the general manager that this ballast, amounting to 164 tons, became unnecessary, owing to cargo being obtainable both up and down the Queensland coast. A letter from Captain Knight to the company at the time confirmed this view; and stated that the ship rolled less, and was more comfortable in a seaway.

From the foregoing the Board are satisfied that the vessel in construction, stability, and seaworthiness was equal to any of her class on the Australian coast.

The cost of the vessel was £102,000. The underwriters' proportion of the insurance was £65,000, and the balance was carried by the owners.

The vessel left Brisbane on the 21st March with a total dead weight of 1,885 tons, fully manned, equipped, in excellent trim, draft aft 22 feet 6 inches, forward 17 feet 9 inches, leaving a clear side of 10 feet 6 inches, with a general cargo and passengers for Northern ports, and reached Mackay on the 23rd March. The weight of cargo in the vessel was 667 tons, almost entirely in the lower hold, and was properly stowed. There were 43 tons in the between decks, 40 of which were for Mackay; and 11 tons on deck, 10 of which were also for Mackay.

The number of persons on board on leaving Mackay were:


First saloon passengers 29.  



Second saloon passengers 19.  



Crew 72. 



Total 120. 


The "Yongala " left the anchorage at Mackay at 1.40 p.m. on the 23rd March, and was reported as having passed Dent Island at 6.30 p.m. on the same day. She was not subsequently heard of. A small portion of her cargo, &c., was picked up on the coast and reefs to the north-west of the Whitsunday Passage.

The Meteorological Bureau telegraphed Flat-top on the 23rd that cyclonic conditions prevailed between Mackay and Townsville. This was signalled to the s.s. " Cooma " from Flat-top; but, unfortunately, the "Yongala" had left some hours previously.

The s.s. " Taiyuan " anchored at Repulse Island on the morning of the 23rd, and had the wind from S.E. (strong gale with occasional terrific squalls). At Dent Island it also blew from S.E., force 7 to 9, with no indication of a cyclone, when the " Yongala" passed at 6.30 p.m.

At Cape Bowling Green, however, the wind commenced at S.S.E., veering to S., S.W., W., and thence to N.W. The "Grantala," bound South, anchored about 7 miles W.N.W. from the Cape, experienced the same weather conditions; barometer 29.50, which would place her on the northern margin of the right-hand semicircle of the storm proving unerringly that in conformity with the laws relating to hurricanes in the Southern Hemisphere it came from the N.E., and in its progressive motion to the S.W. (inland) large trees were uprooted, clearing a well-defined space through the forest at the back of Cape Upstart. 

From the scant data available, it may be assumed that the diameter of the storm did not exceed 30 miles; and as the course of the " Yongala " would be nearly at right angles with the path of the storm, it is just possible that she reached its southern margin, about midnight, between Cape Upstart and Cape Bowling Green.

It has been given in evidence that several masters, including Captain Knight, when proceeding from Whitsunday Passage north, were in the habit of using the inshore route, passing between Armit and Gumbrell Islands. The Board, however, are of opinion, taking into consideration the prevailing weather conditions at the time, that Captain Knight as a careful and experienced master would not use the passage on that occasion.

Several theories were suggested by witnesses (well known shipmasters) as to the cause of the disaster, notably the vessel striking a reef or, owing to some mishap, rendered helpless in the vortex of the storm; but as they were merely conjectures, it is not possible to allow them any consideration; and while it is both gratifying and reassuring that the vessel's stability and seaworthiness remain unassailable, and the competency and carefulness of Captain Knight unimpeachable, the Board, with no desire to indulge in idle speculation, simply find that, after becoming lost to view by the lightkeeper at Dent Island, the fate of the "Yongala" passes beyond human ken into the realms of conjecture, to add one more to the long roll of mysteries of the sea.

The Board have to thank Mr. Northcote, general manager of the Adelaide Steamship Company; Mr. Wareham, the local inspector, and officers for their efforts in supplying every information regarding the vessel. Plans, models, and details of every description were readily furnished, and witnesses brought forward at some inconvenience to the company's working arrangements. The Board also commend the company for their prompt action in endeavouring by every means at their disposal to obtain information regarding the whereabouts of the missing vessel.

From the evidence given by some experienced shipmasters, the Board are confirmed in the opinion that the risk of navigating the Queensland coast is considerably enhanced during the hurricane months, or from December to April; and, although with plenty of sea room and a well-found ship (steam or sail), the observant master can, by heaving to on the right tack, or keeping out of the path of the storm, invariably avert disaster, indeed, at times make it a fair wind to his destined port; but when caught inside the Barrier Reef, with the number of islands and reefs intervening, the Board think it will be generally conceded that the only element of safety is to be found in securing the best anchorage available and several harbours of refuge exist along this part of the coast.

By direction of the Marine Board of Brisbane, this 20th June, 1911.

  


AROHD. MORGAN,  



Secretary.


(Issued in London by the Board of Trade on the 25th day of August, 1911.)


There is a lot to digest and I am going to tackle the transcript section by section in coming posts. Suffice to say that in some respects the report was scant if I compare with the wreck report for the Waratah. Very little attempt was made to outline Yongala's stability in various forms of lading and to what degree 617 tons of cargo, some of which was on deck, affected her GM and righting angle figures. It's as though it was a subject left well alone.

to be continued.....


http://www.plimsoll.org/resources/SCCLibraries/WreckReports2002/21077.asp


WRECKSITE - FITTING TOGETHER THE PIECES OF THE PUZZLE.

The Advertiser (Adelaide) Tuesday 28 March, 1911.

THE WORST FEARED.
VIEWS OF CAPTAINS.
Brisbane, March 27.
No word of the missing Yongala was 
received up to a late hour to-night. The
steamer Grantala, from Cairns via ports,
arrived this evening, and Captain Sim 
when seen on arrival said he met the full 
force of a cyclone within a few hours steam
from Dent Island, where the Yongala was
last sighted. He was therefore in a position 
to give an account of the conditions which 
were probably experienced by the Yongala. 
The Grantala, which is a sister ship to the 
Yongala, left Townsville at 4 pm. on Thursday, 
and arrived off Cape Bowling Green about 
7.30 p.m. the same day. As it was then blowing 
very strongly the captain decided to anchor. 

38 miles = 10.89 knots average. 'Easy steam'. No urgency.

Captain Sim decided to depart Townsville suggesting that there was no cyclone warning at that port and conditions were fairly calm at 4 p.m.. Within 3.5 hours a strong gale came up forcing the decision to anchor in the bay and confirming the sudden energy of the system making landfall at speed.

The wind increased in force from the south 
through west to north. About 100 fathoms 
of cable was paid out, and as the shelter 
was good the ship rode out the gale, which
blew with the force of a cyclone. It was
strongest between 1 and 2 a.m., and was
then blowing from the west south-west.

Upper left hand section of the cyclone, otherwise known as the 'right-hand' of the cyclone.
The wind eventually came round towards
north and the barometer rose.

Cyclone moving over in a more or less southwesterly direction.

Heavy rain fell all night. The anchor was 
raised at 8 a.m. on Friday and the vessel 
proceeded south. Rain and heavy weather
were experienced all the way to Cape 
Moreton. Captain Sim describes the night 
off Bowling Green as one of the worst he 
ever experienced.
Captain McKenzie, of the Innamincka, 
which arrived from Sydney to-night, gave
little hope of the safety of the Yongala.
With the aid of a chart Captain McKenzie
explained that once the Yongala had passed
Dent Island she was in a locality beset by
reefs and islands. With a fearful gale behind 
her and a strong set of the current from the 
land off Burdekin River she would be moving 
through the water at a good pace. He spoke 
in the highest terms of the seagoing qualities 
of the Yongala, but, under the circumstances 
which were experienced by the Grantala in 
the same locality, he had to take a very serious 
view of the matter.

This expert comment supports my contention that Yongala averaged almost 17 knots to the disaster site, 11 miles off Cape Bowling Green Light. From the description given by Captain Sim of the cyclone's sudden development (and dissipation) in the vicinity of Cape Bowling Green, it is strongly suggested that Yongala steamed into the eye and where seas 'come from all directions' overwhelming the tender steamer. 


INQUIRY NOT TO BE HELD IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA.

The Sydney Morning Herald, Monday 29 May, 1911.

THE YONGALA WRECK.
BRISBANE, Sunday.
In connection with the loss of the steamer
Yongala, the Premier has received a telegram
from the Acting Premier of South Australia
stating: "The Marine Board of this State does
not consider it its duty to hold an Inquiry
into the disappearance of the Yongala."
Mr. Denham is referring the matter to the 
Attorney-General for his opinion on the 
constitution of the Inquiry which it is 
proposed to hold in Queensland.


How intriguing. Why would this have been?


The Brisbane Courier, Wednesday 31 May, 1911.

LOSS OF THE YONGALA.
INQUIRY TO BE HELD IN
QUEENSLAND.
ATTORNEY-GENERAL'S OPINION.
When the Premier (Hon. D. F. Denham) 
received information that the Government 
of South Australia would not hold an 
inquiry into the loss of the Yongala, 
Adelaide being the port of registration 
of the vessel, he sought the opinion of the 
Attorney-General (Hon. T. O'sullivan) on 
the position of the Queensland Marine 
Board in making an investigation. 

Mr. O'sullivan wrote: 

"I am of the opinion that an inquiry into the 
wreck of the Yongala can be held by the 
Marine Board of Queensland - By section 
11 of the Navigation Act of 1870 the board 
has power to inquire into any matter in 
connection with wrecks or casualties. 
Under section 3 of the Merchant Shipping 
(Colonial Inquiries) Act, 1982 (repealed 
by the Merchant Shipping Act of 1894), 
every court or tribunal then or thereafter 
authorised in a British possession to make 
inquiries as to ship-wrecks or other casualties 
affecting ships was empowered to hold an 
inquiry into a shipwreck or casualty occurring 
to a British ship on or near the coast of the 
British possession or to a British ship in the
course of a voyage to any port within a
British possession. Before the coming into 
operation of the Merchant Shipping Act
of 1896 the Marine Board of Queensland
had power to inquire as to shipwrecks so
occurring. Section 478 of the Act of
1896 provides 'that the Legislature of a
British possession may authorise any court
or tribunal to make inquiries as to ship-wreck 
or casualty so occurring. This section is more 
restrictive in its terms than the corresponding 
section under the Act of 1882, but was not, 
I think, intended to take away the powers 
possessed before 1895 by the Marine Board 
as to holding inquiries in cases such as that 
of the Yongala. (R. V. Mason, 0 W.A., L.R. 134.)"
The Premier said yesterday afternoon
that the State Treasurer is the authority
for issuing instructions to the Marine
Board, and as soon as he returns to 
Brisbane such instructions will be issued to
hold an inquiry in regard to the loss at
the Yongala.


This was a strange turn of events. That there was almost a refusal on the part of the Government of South Australia to hold the Inquiry begs questions. From a practical point of view there would not have been logistical obstacles to holding the Marine Inquiry in Adelaide. I can only think that there remained some form of animosity between the city of Adelaide and the Adelaide Steamship Company which might have had a negative impact on the outcome of the Inquiry. See:

http://yongalarevisited.blogspot.co.za/2016/08/complaint-against-custom-regulation.html

It will be very interesting to take a detailed look at the Marine Board Inquiry transcript which I intend to do shortly.

Marine Board and Customs Officers, South Australia 1885 (courtesy Arthur Collection)



Wednesday, 28 September 2016

TOP OF A MAST SEEN.

The Mercury (Hobart) Tuesday 26 September, 1911.

THE LOST YONGALA.
SUPPOSED TRACE OF THE
VESSEL.
TOWNSVILLE. September 25.
The captain of  the German Australian 
steamer Annanberge last week
reported to the harbourmaster that on
the trip up the coast in the neighbourhood 
of the Nares Rock, he saw something 
which resembled the top of a mast of a 
vessel a few feet along the water, but 
he was unable to say whether it was 
floating or stationary. Being anxious to 
catch the tide at Townsville, he did not 
investigate. This is regarded as possibly 
connected with the ill-fated steamer Yongala.

Not, as it turned out.



SEARCH ABANDONED.

The Advertiser (Adelaide) 15 April, 1911.

THE YONGALA
SEARCH ABANDONED. 
Brisbane, April 14:
Mr. Wareham, manager of the Adelaide
Company, stated to-night that so far as the
company was concerned, the search for the
wreck of the Yongala had been abandoned.
It had been intended to send the small
steamer Pelican to make a final survey of
the reefs, but the weather conditions 
prevented tile Pelican leaving port, and 
it was decided to give up the search. 
With reference to the offer of apparatus
for revealing objects some distance below
the surface of water. Mr. Wareham
said when the apparatus is received from
Melbourne he will ask Captain Mackay,
the portmaster, to have it tested in 
Moreton Bay. If the test is satisfactory the
apparatus will be tried at Nares Rock and
at other reefs.
Concerning the company's contribution
to the Yongala relief fund, Mr. Wareham
said the directors would contribute, but
the amount would depend on the relief 
required.


By 14 April, 1911, all hope of Yongala disabled and adrift, was abandoned. This was 3 weeks after Yongala failed to arrive at Townsville. Compare this with the case of the Waratah which disappeared off the South African coast, July, 1909. Searches continued well into 1910 - an almost obstinate refusal to accept the harsh reality that Waratah and her 211 souls were lost.

The Adelaide Steamship Company directors did not see the point of further expense incurred by on-going searches and giving false hope to relatives of those lost. The Lunds, owners of the Waratah, on the other hand persisted with the notion that their flagship could not have foundered in a storm of 'exceptional violence' or due to any other cause. 

One does wonder what role was played by value of cargo??

There were no reports or rumours of valuable cargo aboard Yongala. Waratah on the other hand was rumoured to be carrying a vast amount of gold and silver. Appeasing the vain hope of relatives was one thing, recovering valuable assets was quite another....




SS Yongala


SS Waratah

How very similar these two steamers were - both lost without a trace.

Tuesday, 27 September 2016

PLANS.

The Brisbane Courier, Saturday, 1 April, 1911.

THE WRECKED STEAMER YONGALA.
' * ', SECTION PLAN" OF S S. YONGALA. / The parts of the vessel from which wreckage and cargo came are indicated as follows :-A, bucket rack; B, bath grating from lava tory j C, pillows ; D, doors ; E¿ mail bags ; f, bran, potatoes, pumpkin«, &c. Help
SECTION PLAN OF S S. YONGALA.

The parts of the vessel from which wreckage and cargo came are indicated as follows :-A, bucket rack; B, bath grating from lavatory C, pillows ; D, doors ; E, mail bags ; F, bran, potatoes, pumpkins, &c.
Yesterday was the eighth full day which
has passed since the Yongala disappeared,
and still no direct evidence is forthcoming 
of the extent of the disaster which
has all too certainly overtaken her. The
only fresh information is the discovery
of a case of pears on the coast near
Cape Bowling Green, which may or may
not have come from the Yongala. In
view of the other wreckage already picked
up, the probability is that the case came
from the insulated space of the Yongala's
holds, which would further confirm the
supposition that the fine steamer has gone
to pieces. 

The images below taken from the Trove newspaper report are difficult to make out in parts. However, it is clear that produce from the insulated hold marked F strongly suggests that the steamer 'came apart' releasing this cargo. There is another possibility that the after hatch breached and the sudden inundation of tons of water could have liberated cargo.

There is no secret that the wreck of the Yongala is intact and does not confirm the former hypothesis. The after hatch must have been the weak link during the final moments of the doomed steamer.