The Sydney Morning Herald, Monday 29 May, 1911.
THE YONGALA WRECK.
BRISBANE, Sunday.
In connection with the loss of the steamer
Yongala, the Premier has received a telegram
from the Acting Premier of South Australia
stating: "The Marine Board of this State does
not consider it its duty to hold an Inquiry
into the disappearance of the Yongala."
Mr. Denham is referring the matter to the
Attorney-General for his opinion on the
constitution of the Inquiry which it is
proposed to hold in Queensland.
How intriguing. Why would this have been?
The Brisbane Courier, Wednesday 31 May, 1911.
LOSS OF THE YONGALA.
INQUIRY TO BE HELD IN
QUEENSLAND.
ATTORNEY-GENERAL'S OPINION.
When the Premier (Hon. D. F. Denham)
received information that the Government
of South Australia would not hold an
inquiry into the loss of the Yongala,
Adelaide being the port of registration
of the vessel, he sought the opinion of the
Attorney-General (Hon. T. O'sullivan) on
the position of the Queensland Marine
Board in making an investigation.
Mr. O'sullivan wrote:
"I am of the opinion that an inquiry into the
wreck of the Yongala can be held by the
Marine Board of Queensland - By section
11 of the Navigation Act of 1870 the board
has power to inquire into any matter in
connection with wrecks or casualties.
Under section 3 of the Merchant Shipping
(Colonial Inquiries) Act, 1982 (repealed
by the Merchant Shipping Act of 1894),
every court or tribunal then or thereafter
authorised in a British possession to make
inquiries as to ship-wrecks or other casualties
affecting ships was empowered to hold an
inquiry into a shipwreck or casualty occurring
to a British ship on or near the coast of the
British possession or to a British ship in the
course of a voyage to any port within a
British possession. Before the coming into
operation of the Merchant Shipping Act
of 1896 the Marine Board of Queensland
had power to inquire as to shipwrecks so
occurring. Section 478 of the Act of
1896 provides 'that the Legislature of a
British possession may authorise any court
or tribunal to make inquiries as to ship-wreck
or casualty so occurring. This section is more
restrictive in its terms than the corresponding
section under the Act of 1882, but was not,
I think, intended to take away the powers
possessed before 1895 by the Marine Board
as to holding inquiries in cases such as that
of the Yongala. (R. V. Mason, 0 W.A., L.R. 134.)"
The Premier said yesterday afternoon
that the State Treasurer is the authority
for issuing instructions to the Marine
Board, and as soon as he returns to
Brisbane such instructions will be issued to
hold an inquiry in regard to the loss at
the Yongala.
This was a strange turn of events. That there was almost a refusal on the part of the Government of South Australia to hold the Inquiry begs questions. From a practical point of view there would not have been logistical obstacles to holding the Marine Inquiry in Adelaide. I can only think that there remained some form of animosity between the city of Adelaide and the Adelaide Steamship Company which might have had a negative impact on the outcome of the Inquiry. See:
http://yongalarevisited.blogspot.co.za/2016/08/complaint-against-custom-regulation.html
It will be very interesting to take a detailed look at the Marine Board Inquiry transcript which I intend to do shortly.
Marine Board and Customs Officers, South Australia 1885 (courtesy Arthur Collection) |