Monday 22 August 2016

CARGO FROM CAIRNS.

The Sydney Morning Herald, Friday 7 June, 1907.

Yongala, ss, from Cairns, via ports: 2600 bgs sugar,
621 rails, 31 bales fish, 20 cs tins, 190 bgs
bones, 6 brs gold, 120 cs tomatoes, 550 cs pines, 50 cs
fruit, 55 bgs oysters, 130 cs glass, 20 bgs tin ore, 150
bales hides, 710 cs bananas, 58 bags hams and sundries.


This gives us an idea of goods shipped from Cairns to Sydney. Roughly 1000 tons - half of normal operating consignment. 



wikipedia



It later developed into a railhead and major port for exporting sugar cane, gold and other metals, minerals and agricultural products from surrounding coastal areas and the Atherton Tableland region.



'agriculture on the lowlands (sugar cane, corn, rice, bananas, pineapples), and for fruit and dairy production on the Tableland.'


loading goods, Cairns Port - courtesy Queensland National Library.

Fix this text

CAPTAINS REES, SIM AND MACKENZIE.

The Advertiser (Adelaide) Tuesday 27 March, 1906.

Yongala, 1820 tons, J Rees from Brisbane,
via ports. Adelaide Steamship Company agents.
Passengers - 46 saloon, 49 second cabin, and 
96 en route to Western Australia.

Grantala, 1787 tons, J Sim, from Western
Australia. Adelaide Steamship Company agents.
Passengers - 35 saloon 48 second cabin, and 
105 en route to eastern States
Note how the masters of the Adelaide Steamship Company swapped vessels from time to time. Captain Rees was later to be associated with the SS Koombana which was also lost in a cyclone - 20 March, 1912, under the command of Captain Allen.

The Sydney Morning Herald, Saturday 9 June 1906.

The Adelaide Company's steamer Yongala, with
117 passengers, arrived at Sydney at 8.30 a.m. 
yesterday, after a fair weather trip from Western 
Australia, in command of Captain C O. Mackenzie. 
She left Fremantle on May 30, Albany on May 31,
Adelaide on Monday last, and Melbourne at 5.30 p.m.
on Wednesday.



SS Koombana (wikipedia) - note prominent superstructure - a trend.



Sunday 21 August 2016

NEW STEAMSHIP SERVICE.

The Queenslander, Brisbane, Saturday 27 January, 1906.

NEW STEAMSHIP SERVICE.
BRISBANE TO WESTERN
AUSTRALIA.
The decision of the interstate companies
to extend the service of their Western
Australian steamers to Brisbane will be
looked upon with gratification by all.
Queenslanders, and the hope is expressed
that the results will justify the undertaking
and encourage the companies to run their
steamers still further north. A regular
direct service twice monthly will be maintained 
from Brisbane to Western Australia, via Sydney, 
Melbourne, Adelaide, and Albany. This is a 
most important feature in connection with the 
Australian coastal service, as it will be the first 
attempt to have direct communication between 
Brisbane and West Australian ports.

The service is to be maintained by the
steamers Riverina and Bombala (Howard,
Smith Company, Limited), Yongala and
Grantala (Adelaide Steamship Company,
Limited). Although this service is at
present a bi-monthly one, it must be 
remembered that the interstate companies
have the regular steamers, such as the
Wodongu, Wyundra, Aramac, Arawatta,
(A.U.S.N. Company, Limited), Gaibo and
Buninyong (Howard Smith Company,Limited), 
Marloo and Wollowra (Adelaide Steamship 
Company, Limited), running in a regular 
service twice weekly from Queensland ports, 
connecting with the large steamers Kyarra, 
Kanowna, Coolgardie, and Bumnubeet at 
either Sydney or Melbourne. The whole of 
the steamers with one exception are fitted 
with refrigerated chambers, which make it 
possible for fruit, &c, to be carried from
the hot climate of Queensland to Southern
and Western Australian ports. The steamers 
are purely Commonwealth vessels, and
it is hoped that this new departure
will meet with success, and that in the
near future the results will justify the
service to the Northern ports of Queensland.
The new service was inaugurated on
Friday week by the arrival of the Adelaide
Steamship Company's steamer Yongala.
The vessel, which is in command of
Captain Rees, came from Fremantle, and
Albany, Adelaide, Melbourne, and Sydney, 
en route. At Sydney Captain C. C. Mackenzie, 
of the Innamincka, joined the steamer, 
and acted as pilot to Brisbane. The Yongala 
is a new steel screw vessel of 3664 tons gross, 
1825 tons net, and this is the first voyage to 
Queensland waters. The steamer was designed 
from specified plans arranged in Australia to
meet passenger and cargo requirements,

Yongala was moving into a new phase of operations and reference is made to 'purely Commonwealth vessels'. This reminds us of the competition presented by ocean liners operated by companies such as the Blue Anchor Line, servicing ports Sydney, Melbourne and Port Adelaide en route to South Africa.

Saturday 20 August 2016

FAST STEAMING.

The Sydney Morning Herald, Saturday 17 February, 1906.

FAST STEAMING BY THE YONGALA.
The Adelaide Company's steamer Yongala which 
arrived here yesterday, accomplished an especially 
fast run from Melbourne. She left Williamstown at 11
p m on Wednesday, and entered the Heads at
12.10 pm yesterday, having thus covered the 
distance in 37 hours 10 minutes. The trip occupied
only 37 hours 14 minutes from heads to heads, 
the Yongala having maintained an average speed
of 15.5 knots.

The Sydney Morning Herald, Friday 4 October, 1907.
SMART RUN BY THE YONGALA,
The Adelaide Company's steamer Yongala made a
smart run from Melbourne. She left the wharf at 3.30
on Wednesday morning, and arrived at the Sydney
wharf at 7,30 p.m. on Thursday, making the run from
wharf to wharf in 40 hours. The distance from Heads
to Heads was accomplished in the fast time of 34 1/2
hours, an average speed of over 15 knots, being 
maintained throughout. The Yongala brought 101 
passengers, and will leave for Queensland ports 
to-morrow morning.

Fix this text
Prestige was important to the Adelaide Steamship Company reflected by these fast times and little regard for coal consumption. Yongala was a feather in the company's cap and such 'marketing' probably enhanced bookings. 



courtesy: Edwardes Collection.

Thursday 18 August 2016

TRANS AUSTRALIAN RAILWAY.

The Argus (Melbourne) Thursday 21 September, 1905.

TRANS-AUSTRALIAN RAILWAY
REMARKS BY LORD NORTHCOTE.
PERTH, Wednesday.— In proposing the
health of His Excellency the Governor-
General at Parliament-house this afternoon,
the Premier (Mr. Rason) said that up to
the present Western Australia was not
quite satisfied with the result of federation,
but that the people looked forward hopefully 
to the future. At present, however, he would 
be excused if he said that the other states of 
the Commonwealth did not appear to have 
recognised to the fullest possible extent what 
the true federal spirit really meant. Western 
Australia's experience of the federal spirit was 
that it would hardly bear analysis up to date.
Lord Northcote, in responding to the
toast, said that if he was to judge from the
receptions which visitors from the eastern
states received in Western Australia he
could undertake to say that when the
trans-Australian railway was completed
they would cease to have the protection of
the Great Australian Bight. (Laughter.)
When the railway was completed, even the
hospitality of Western Australia would be
severely strained, owing to the influx of
visitors from the eastern states. Considering 
the energy and enterprise which Western 
Australia had shown in conquering so
many difficulties, the accomplishment of
the particular work which had been referred 
to would not prove to be insuperable.


wikipedia:



The Trans-Australian Railway crosses the Nullarbor Plain of Australia from Port Augusta in South Australia to Kalgoorlie inWestern Australia. It includes a 478 kilometres (297 mi) stretch of dead-straight track, the world's longest, between the 797 km (495 mi) post west of Ooldea and the 1,275 km (792 mi) post west of Loongana.



In 1901, the six Australian colonies federated to form the Commonwealth of Australia. At that time, Perth, the capital of Western Australia, was isolated from the remaining Australian States by thousands of miles of desert terrain and the only practicable method of transport was by sea, a time-consuming, inconvenient and often uncomfortable voyage across the Great Australian Bight, a stretch of water known for rough seas



In 1907 legislation was passed, allowing for the route to be surveyed. The survey was completed in 1909 and proposed a route from Port Augusta (the existing railhead at the head of Spencer Gulf in South Australia's wheatfields) via Tarcoolato the gold mining centre of Kalgoorlie in Western Australia, a distance of 1063 miles (1711 km). The line was to be to the standard gauge of 4 ft 8
 
12 in(1,435 mm), even though the state railway systems at both ends were narrow gauge at the time. Its cost was estimated at £4,045,000.
Legislation authorising the construction was passed in December 1911 by the Andrew Fisher Government and work commenced in September 1912 in Port Augusta.

Work proceeded eastwards from Kalgoorlie and westwards from Port Augusta through the years of the First World War. By 1915, the two ends of the line were just over 600 miles (966 km) apart with materials being delivered daily.[9] Construction progressed steadily as the line was extended through dry and desolate regions until the two halves of the line met on 17 October 1917.

courtesy: https://www.engineersaustralia.org.au/.../Trans_Australian_Railway_Nomination.pdf 

When the Trans-Australian Railway joined eastern and western Australia in 1917 it provided a physical link which was to be of major commercial and strategic importance and which improved immeasurably the convenience and comfort of interstate travellers. The railway was also a symbol to all Australians of the bonds which had bound the colonies together in Federation.
  
 courtesy: https://www.environment.gov.au/heritage/ahc/publications/linking-a.../chapter7

The peak of the coastal shipping industry was in 1913 and 1914, when vessels with a total capacity of over 20,000 passengers made regular sailings around the Australian coast. In 1913 no fewer than five new passenger liners were delivered. The ships could offer comfortable services, which were competitive with rail in speed and far more comfortable, provided the weather was good. Journey times between Melbourne and Sydney or Brisbane and Sydney were typically around 36 hours, or two nights and a day. By comparison, it took about 30 hours from Sydney to Brisbane by train at the time on the inland route via Wallangarra, and passengers had to change trains at dawn and travel in unheated carriages over Australia's highest railway summit, where winter night-time temperatures were generally well below freezing. The ship - with its hot water baths, fine restaurants with orchestras and spacious cabins in first class - was an excellent option compared with the train, and generally cheaper as well. Most ships ran a regular run from Brisbane to Fremantle, stopping at all the mainland capitals on the way. With so many vessels in the trade, there was a sailing most days.

While the ships were more comfortable than the trains, they were not as safe, especially in tropical waters. The north Queensland run was especially hazardous, where there was the combination of frequent cyclones, which often reduced visibility to zero, and poorly charted reefs. In 1911 and 1912 the Adelaide Steamship Company lost two large liners (the SS Yongala and SS Koombana), together with their entire crews, mail, and complements of passengers without trace in cyclones in northern waters.20 The southern runs were far safer, and it was here that most ships were concentrated. Even in temperate waters, though, there were hazards, especially at the Rip at the entrance to Port Phillip Bay. Moreover, before the days of radio and radar, collisions could happen at any time, as for example when the North Coast Steam Navigation Company's little SS Helen Nicoll ran down the far larger Brisbane-bound passenger liner SS Keilawarra off Coffs Harbour in 1886 with the loss of 46 lives.

The West Australian (Perth) Saturday 2 May, 1903

THE TRANS-AUSTRALIAN:
RAILWAY.

- To the Editor -

Sir, is patriotism dead? Has sentiment 
been dropped out of the vocabulary of the 
citizens of the States forming the Australian 
Commonwealth? It would appear so, judging 
by the tone of the Press; almost without exception;
from Adelaide to Brisbane. The most brutally selfish, 
parochial arguments are adduced to prove what? -
That to support the contemplated trans-Australian
railway might interfere with the proposed
line to Port Darwin; - that it would mean
a loss of trade to the Australian steam-
ship companies; that the three great
cities between the terminal points might
lose the chance of levying tribute upon:
travellers if there was a rail line constructed 
from Fremantle to Brisbane; that it will never 
pay that it will cost five millions sterling ; and 
that the money cannot be obtained in the London
market.

The West Australian (Perth), Thursday 15 September, 1904.

TRANS-AUSTRALIAN
RAILWAY.
THE SURVEY.
FURTHER DISCUSSION IN HOUSE.
OF REPRESENTATIVES. 
SPEECH BY MR. MAHON.
THE DANGER OF SECESSION.

Melbourne, September 14

To show that the Eastern States
had profited by the prosperity of Western 
Australia, he would quote amounts
sent from Western. Australia to the
other States through the Post Office
from 1898 to 1903 (both years inclusive). 
To South .Australia the amount
was £426,731; to Victoria;. £1,316,350;
to New South Wales, £491,511; to
Queensland, £68,904 and to Tasmania,
£96,033.

During Yongala's formative years in service the issue of the trans-Australian railway was a hot topic of discussion. Not only were there those opposed to the permanent link and federation, the shipowners who provided a service between Western Australia and the Southern States, felt under threat. 



workers on trans-Australian railway - courtesy National Museum of Australia.

Fix this text

Fix this text


AGGRESSIVE GROWTH; 'COMBINE' AND UNFAIR ADVANTAGE.

courtesy: www.samemory.sa.gov.au/site/page.cfm?u=728

Aggressive growth


(late 1800's)



These additional ships could be deployed into the Western Australian trade, or anywhere else: Adelaide Steamship Company had plenty of options. They now bought out Anderson & Marshall and secured a foothold in Western Australia with two additional steamers and three coal hulks, and a ketch tender and company moorings in two ports. The ASC's services now ranged from Melbourne around the southern coast to northern Western Australia.
There was still opposition from other shipowners and overseas lines, and Adelaide Steamship Company also pursued the Darwin mail contract, which they considered theirs by right. The South Australian Post Office disagreed.
Expansion in Western Australia meant that the ASC's resources were stretched - there were never enough ships to blanket the competition, which seemed to be the important thing. Much juggling of ships occurred. A price war with the ketch trade, which Adelaide Steamship Company had no chance of winning was narrowly averted. A new company, Yorke's Peninsula Steamship Company, undercut them in the Gulf trade, and John Darling tried to seize a portion of the Gulf trade as well. Despite local squabbles the Western Australian trade developed with the discovery of gold - first in the Northern Territory, then the Kimberley, Pilbara and finally the Coolgardie-Kalgoorlie fields. Initially Adelaide Steamship Company was the only company operating to these fields, but such a monopoly could not and did not continue. However there was plenty of trade for all, including for the overseas lines, and by the end of 1899 territorial rights and the regulation of freight rates and passenger fares would be hammered out by the shipping industry.

The Advertiser (Adelaide) Friday 15 September, 1904.

THE SHIPPING COMBINE.
SHIPOWNERS' INTENTIONS.
NO REDUCTION OF WAGES.
Melbourne, December 29.
No attempt is made by the shipowners
engaged in the inter-State coastal trade to
deny that a mutual agreement or "combine,"' 
as it is called, has been established
with a view to working the shipping business 
within their control upon more advantageous 
terms to themselves than was possible under 
a system of cut-throat competition. They 
declare their reluctance to enter on a war of 
words with the officials of the Seamen's Union 
in regard to the consequences which may follow 
their actions in making new arrangements for the
conduct of their business. Nevertheless
the chairman of the Steamship Owners' 
Association (Mr. E. Northcote), the general
manager of the Adelaide Steamship Company, 
spoke with freedom to-day in reply
to the statements made by Mr. Henry Beltrage 
(the secretary of the Seamen's Union).
"What we are doing,'' explained Mr.
Northcote, '"is simply to reorganise the
shipping business in the same manner as
the Railways Commissioners might rearrange 
the railway business if it were found that the 
department was not on a satisfactory footing. 
The necessity of doing something of the kind 
has been forced upon us by circumstances
There has been a large introduction of new 
tonnage by various shipping companies of 
recent years, and the trade has not increased
sufficiently to justify the retention of both
old steamers and new. The latest Vessels
being larger and more convenient and up
to-date generally, are naturally in favor
with passengers, and as regards cargo some
of them carry more than twice the tonnage
taken by the older boats. It is an undoubted 
fact, as every one connected with shipping knows, 
that owing to the steamers of different companies 
competing with and overlapping one another, 
many of them have run short of freight, and it 
is hoped under the new system that with full 
cargoes matters will be more satisfactory not
only for the shipping companies, but also
for the general public. What we are doing is 
to give the travelling public the benefit of the 
new boats whilst we are withdrawing some 
of the old ones.

When asked what number of boats it
was proposed to lay up, Mr. Northcote
said that question had not been decided
up to the present. It would be a matter
of evolution. A great deal would depend
upon the course of trade. If freights
should fall off vessels would have to come
off too. "It is quite correct, as asserted
by Mr. Belfrage," he continued, "that four
steamers are being taken off the Queensland 
service, but there is generally a reduction in 
that quarter during the first half of the year
Business with the northern ports is not brisk until 
later on, when meat, hides, bones, and tallow come down.

There may be a couple more steamers suspended 
in connection with the western trade. The number 
of dispatches of steamers from Melbourne to the 
West will not, however, be decreased. There will be
two boats sent away each week, but the
sailing of the second one may be a little
irregular. The time-tables show that
these steamers used to run from Fremantle
to Sydney, and take a month on the voyage. 
Under the new arrangements they
will proceed as far as Melbourne only, and
the time occupied will be three weeks. I
am speaking now as regards passenger 
steamers. but it is also possible that;some of
the cargo boats may cease running. If
freights offer they will remain on. I can
assure you that the shipping companies will
be delighted to run all the boats they can
both for their own sake and for the sake
of their employees."
When asked whether the number of men
estimated by Mr. Belfrage, viz., 250, would
be thrown out of employment, Mr.
Northcote said that that number might be some
where about the mark. At the same time
he pointed out that the larger boats which
had recently been added to some of the
fleets employed invariably more stokers,
seamen, and stewards than the older 
vessels used to. Regarding the 
prospects of any of the surplus steamers finding 
employment in the trade with the islands,
that was hardly likely to happen at present. 
The cross-chartering of vessels between 
different companies would not affect seamen 
or passengers in any way.

The company by whom the men, were 
engaged would continue to be responsible for
their wages. "No doubt," added Mr.
Northcote, "the public are a little puzzled
at the fact that a boat belonging to one
company should be run by another, but
we were bound to make some such 
arrangement in order to equalise matters.
The time-tables had to be filled up, but
we could not go to one company and say,
'You must lay up all your boats.' What
we are doing is to try to divide the passengers 
and cargo in connection with the different 
ports as equally as we can amongst us. 
It has been a difficult matter to determine, 
but we have arranged the business upon as 
equitable a basis as possible.There is really 
nothing new in such a system. It is merely a 
question of chartering for the time being. 
Another company will charter our boats, and 
we shall charter theirs. The chartering of
one company's ships by some other company 
goes on all over the world."'
Mr. Northcote declined to discuss the
question of future developments. Everything 
he said, would depend on the condition of trade. 
As a matter of fact steamers would be put 
on or taken off automatically as circumstances 
warranted. "But you can say this," he added finally,
"that we have not the slightest idea of reducing 
wages."
Brisbane, December 29.
The arrangement by which the Adelaide
Steamship Company and the Howard Smith
Company run alternate weekly boats to
northern ports comes into operation in the
middle of January.
SOUTH AUSTRALIAN VIEWS.
NOT MUCH EFFECT ON PORT
ADELAIDE.
Some consternation was caused in Adelaide 
by the news that in consequence of
a combination of the steamship companies
engaged in the coastal trade several of the
steamers now employed were to be laid
up. 
From another source, however, a statement 
was obtained which throws further
light on the cause which has induced the
steamship companies to take the step of
reducing their service. In Melbourne the
steamship companies gave out as reason 
for this action that they wished to do away 
with what they describe as surplus tonnage. 
What they desire is to retain the trade, but 
to run their ships with full cargoes instead 
of their being partially empty. In other 
words they maintain that there has been 
an excess of tonnage over freight offering
and that the same trade can be dealt with 
by fewer vessels. 

Our informant pointed out that the combine 
referred to is no new creation, that it has 
been in existence for years.
When, however, the Adelaide Steamship
companies put on the western coastal 
service the new vessels Grantala and 
Yongala, and the A.U.S.N. Company brought
out the Kyarra and Kanowna, and the
Howard Smith line the Bombala, the bulk
of the passenger trade naturally drifted
to those steamers, and the lines having
boats less up to date were left lamenting.

It is suggested that in view of that fact
the smaller companies complained of
their loss of trade, and that the present
action is intended more equally to distribute 
the trade between the various companies. 
Under the agreement which has been entered 
into by the five inter-State shipping organisations 
the newer and larger vessels only will be utilised, 
and the elder ones may be diverted to other trade, 
although there may be some difficulty in 
finding employment for them elsewhere,
as they were specially built for the Australian 
coasting traffic. But as there is a large and 
increasing trade to the islands of the Pacific 
there is no doubt the Australian companies 
will make every effort to exploit it.
Another phase of the matter was mentioned 
by a shipping man. It was that the
reduction of the coastal service may to
some extent be due to the unfair competítion 
of some ocean steamers. The ocean
steamers pay lower wages, get their repairs
done in Europe at a cheaper rate, and also
obtain a large part of their stores in a
a cheaper market, so that they are able 
to "cut" the rates charged by the inter-State 
liners - and do so. A specific instance is 
mentioned of two trump steamers which 
brought cargoes from foreign ports to 
Port Adelaide, and then took freight for 
the coastal ports at cutting rates, thus 
coming into direct competition for the 
cargo trade of the Commonwealth.

No doubt Lund's Blue Anchor Line was referenced here!
With the local steamship owners, who are
compelled to pay higher wages to their
crews it is pointed out that if ocean
steamers were debarred from "cutting
rates" in the inter-State trade, and were
placed on the same footing as locally-owned
vessels, there would be abundant employment 
for the whole of the coastal steamers which are 
intended to be withdrawn from the service - 
Looking at the matter from an Australian point 
of view, it is certainly in the interests of the 
Commonwealth that the coasting trade should be in
the hands of an Australian mercantile marine. 
In the case of the coastal service the
profits earned are retained in the Common
-wealth, local labor is employed to man and
work the ships, repairs are effected locally,
and the whole of the stores and provisions
are bought within the Commonwealth.
While the wages paid to the seamen are, of
course, spent in Australia. Most, if not
the whole, of this money goes to England 
or Europe in the case of the ocean steamers.
A gentleman who has a thorough know-
ledge of the coastal shipping trade has 
supplied us with some details as to the 
proposed reduction of the service and 
the effect that it will have on South Australia.
"The chief alteration,"' he said, "will be in
regard to the northern trade from Melbourne 
to Queensland. Only two steamers
will be taken off the southern service.
Hitherto there have been nine boats running 
from Sydney to Fremantle. In future
they intend to run four steamers from 
Sydney and three from Melbourne - Adelaide-,
so far as the shipping community is concerned, 
will not suffer in any way from the change. 


The Sydney cargo will be brought
on by the boats coming from Sydney, and
consequently the boats from Melbourne will
have plenty of space available for Adelaide
cargo destined for Fremantle. One steamer 
will leave Port Adelaide every Saturday and 
another every Wednesday for the West. 
That will be two vessels a week exactly 
what we have been having in the
past.

In addition to those seven vessels owned by 
the five coastal-companies in the federation 
there will be the steamers of outside 
owners, such as the Melbourne Shipping 
Company, whose steamers will be dispatched 
at short intervals. It is the Sydney people who 
are left in the hole by this matter, as a boat 
which formerly left on Wednesday has been 
struck off the itinerary.

As far as the effect of these new arrangements 
on the employment of labor is concerned, 
I do not think there is much reason for agitation, 
because for many years past the steamers 
plying between Sydney and Fremantle have 
not drawn their crews from South Australia, 
but almost entirely from Melbourne or Sydney. 
There are at present on the inter-State boats 
very few men who have signed on in South 
Australia. The chief saving to the companies
 in this reduction scheme is in regard to the
Queensland trade."'
One Adelaide merchant suggested that the
effect of the reduction of the service between 
Sydney and Fremantle might result
in difficulty in securing space for cargo
from Adelaide to the West. It is stated
that this eventuality is not likely to occur- 
in fact that the new arrangement would 
tend to decrease that possibility, for the 
reason previously stated. In further support 
of this view it is mentioned that for a long 
time past there has been no lack of tonnage 
to the West.

The stage was set for Yongala's transfer of duties from the West Australia - Southern States run to the East Coast. The coastal shipping industry was evolving and adapting to that which would ensure survival and profit with no end of resentment for the 'ocean steamers' lines. The threat of the trans-Australian railway did not help confidence either, a sword of Damocles hanging over the West Australia - Southern States trade route. The coastal steamer trade was dominated by the Adelaide Steamship Company, Howard Smith Line and AUSN line (Australasian United Steam Navigation Company).

'Combine' has a certain 'ring' to it...