Tuesday, 11 October 2016

CAPTAINS DIBBLE AND MACKENZIE.

Cairns Post, Wednesday 14 June 1911.

George Dibble, master mariner,
said he was familiar with the coast,
and had worked out a theory as to
what might have happened to the
Yongala. He thought Capt. Knight
followed the usual inside course 
between Armit and Gumbrell Islands,
because all the masters he knew took
that course in all weathers. After passing 
Cape Gloucester six or seven miles he 
probably found the weather so bad that 
he anchored in ten to twelve fathoms of 
water. After lying some time his anchors 
would have dragged till the cables parted
and she went on to Nares Rock and sank 
in a few minutes. If she was found she 
would be within a five miles radius of 
Nares Rock. 
Captain Mackay: Surely the £1000
reward offered for the location of
her should be sufficient inducement
for you to try to find her.
Captain Dibble: I have been in
the hospital for two months. I
have laid my theory and chart
before the Treasury.
Captain Mackay: should strongly
recommend you to try to find her.
Don't you intend to do anything ? 
Capt. Dibble : Not more than I 
have done. It's only my opinion.

By Mr. O'Shea : He did not think
for a moment that Captain Knight 
was guilty of negligence. He would
have done his best under the
circumstances by anchoring.

Reinforcement by experienced mariners that Captain Knight should have sought anchorage. They were not to know that he did not and neither did Yongala strike Nares Rock. But there was unambiguous confirmation that Captain Knight was likely to have used the inshore route.
Captain MacKenzie, commander of
the Wollowra, said he was in charge
of the Yongala for six months. She
was the finest sea boat he was ever
in Captain Knight was an officer of 
wide experience, and very capable. 
In 20 years on the coast he (witness) 
had never gone outside Armit and 
Gumbrell Islands more than three 
times, and he was confident Captain 
Knight took a course between the 
islands because it was agreed it was 
the safest. 

It does not necessarily follow that because most masters used the inside passage in all weathers that it was the safer option. Captain Mackenzie was defending collective actions. The Marine Board on the other hand made this point quite clear:

It has been given in evidence that several masters, including Captain Knight, when proceeding from Whitsunday Passage north, were in the habit of using the inshore route, passing between Armit and Gumbrell Islands. The Board, however, are of opinion, taking into consideration the prevailing weather conditions at the time, that Captain Knight as a careful and experienced master would not use the passage on that occasion.

There must have been risk associated with negotiating the narrow passage between the islands in weather conditions when visibility was poor!

His information, was that the storm in 
which the Yongala was lost came from 
S.W. and not N.E. He was told the wind 
was S. and S.W. all that night. He did 
not think any ill befell the Yongala in 
passing the islands, and believed she 
got past Upstart safely. He thought she 
was blown away to leeward among the
reefs.
Captain Mackay : What ? With
the wind blowing from N.E. ?
Captain MacKenzie : But I don't
agree with you as to the direction
of the storm. In further evidence
he said the passage between the 
islands was hours off the vortex of 
the storm, and if anything happened
there Captain Knight could have got
round Cape Gloucester, and lowered
his boats. He reckoned the Yongala
struck somewhere about Flinders
Passage. This cyclone was peculiar,
but there were records of cyclones
working the wrong way, namely from
the southwest.

There was confusion as to the nature of the storm system. In my previous post I even went so far as questioning whether it was a genuine cyclone or not. Both Captain Mackenzie and Captain Sim (who was present in Bowling Green Bay) claimed that the wind predominated from the south. This would be in keeping with the distribution of the wreckage discovered. The Marine Inquiry was very clear on this point - it was a cyclone originating from the northeast, moving southwest inland and uprooting large trees in the vicinity of Cape Upstart.

If one examines the image below Cape Upstart is 30 n miles southeast of Cape Bowling Green. Cyclones in the southern hemisphere rotate clockwise. If the brunt of the cyclone impacted Cape Upstart and it was genuinely 30 n miles in diameter, this suggests that the winds reported by Captain Mackenzie and Captain Sim would initially have come from the southeast, shifting to the southwest (and finally northwest as the system passed). It also suggests that Captain Sim and the final position of the Yongala were on the upper, left hand fringe (right-hand side) of the cyclone moving from northeast to southwest. It also suggests that Captain Knight had steamed, safely, through the worst of the system before arriving at Yongala's final position. In fact the cyclone may very well have been a cyclone hybrid as depicted in the graphic below with a predominating gale from the south.

Even experienced mariners of the time got confused about the direction of wind originating from a cyclone and Captain Mackenzie's assertion that the cyclone moved from southwest to northeast is not possible. The only way his statement could have been true is if the system was actually a severe frontal system moving up from the south and then veering off to the northeast as it reached Cape Bowling Green.

If the hybrid cyclone theory holds how then does this explain the conditions experienced by Captain Dawson some 100 n miles south of the event at Repulse Island? 

http://www.bom.gov.au/cyclone/about/eastern.shtml

'Even cyclones that are located off the north or central Queensland coast can affect areas well to the south. Heavy rain can occur well to the south of the cyclone and the strong easterly winds between the cyclone and a high to the south may cause large waves over the east coast.' 
Although the facts as they stand point clearly to a cyclonic event, the alternative frontal system theory would at least offer Captain Knight some dignity in that he was justified in attempting to outrun the system - and got within 50 n miles of his destination at Townsville. Why would Captain Knight have attempted to outrun a storm system rather than seeking safe anchorage? I have a theory on this and will return to this fascinating subject in my next post.

Captain Mackay; since the offering of
the reward all reefs from Flinders Passage 
to Bowen have been thoroughly searched 
by ships and that does away with your theory.
Captain MacKenzie : She would slide back 
into deep water. She certainly would not 
have capsized. I believe she was blown to 
the N.E. onto the reefs. He added that he .
had been in cyclones in which a ship
was helpless, because no one could
do anything more than hold on. A drop 
of rain or sea water would cut the flesh 
and one could not even speak.
Captain Johnson : What would you
make your starting point of search ?

Captain MacKenzie : Broadhurst Reef.
Captain Mackay : It was well
searched for a week.
Captain MacKenzie ; It would take
six months to properly search it.
He thought a captive balloon would
be of value for such a.search.
Captain Johnson: Do you think
that part of the coast is sufficiently
lighted?
Captain-MacKenzie : There should
be a light on Cape Gloucester or 
Middle Head.
Captain Mackay mentioned that a
great many recommendations had
been made for lights, but Cape
Gloucester had never been mentioned.
Capt. Johnston ; Would additional
lights have made any difference that
night ?
Captain MacKenzie : It all depends
what the night was. It might have
cleared for a moment just when the
light would have been of use.
Captain Mackay : Would wireless
have been any help that night?
Captain MacKenzie : No. I think
not.
In answer to further questions he
said Captain Knight probably kept
on thinking he was north of the
storm.

What a fascinating parting statement by Captain Mackenzie defending my theory that Captain Knight thought he was north of a frontal system and NOT steaming into the heart of a cyclone. There is so much more to this mystery than meets the eye.




courtesy: http://www.bom.gov.au/cyclone/about/eastern.shtml

4 comments:

  1. Fascinating is the word. I could be reading accounts of similar shipwrecks off the coast of Natal and Transkei. Do you think the nature of the 'storm' associated with the Waratah's end might have been equally doubtful?

    ReplyDelete
  2. What a significant question, Mole. There are sources suggesting that the cold front storm associated with the loss of the Waratah was not as severe as generally reported, further backed up by the fact that at least another 10 steamers on the South African coast at the time (far less sophisticated than Waratah) survived the gale. My personal feeling is that in both cases the alleged severity of the storms gave the Courts a much-needed escape route. The steamers could thus be condemned to 'perils of the sea' - no fault of crew or construction.

    ReplyDelete
  3. And as if lessons were not learned, the Adelaide Steamship Company's SS Koombana was doomed to vanish in a cyclone off Australia's northwest coast almost a year later, 20 March, 1912. Koombana also boasted a prominent top hamper with low draught - similar to Yongala. The Court came to the following: 'In conclusion, the Court simply finds, without indulging in useless speculation, that the stability and seaworthiness of the SS Koombana were unassailable, and the competency and carefulness of master, Captain Allen, beyond question, and after being lost sight of at sea on the 20th March 1912, her fate passes beyond human knowledge and remains a mystery of the sea'. Compare this with the closing statement of the Yongala Inquiry: 'the vessel's stability and seaworthiness remain unassailable, and the competency and carefulness of Captain Knight unimpeachable, the Board, with no desire to indulge in idle speculation, simply find that, after becoming lost to view by the lightkeeper at Dent Island, the fate of the "Yongala" passes beyond human ken into the realms of conjecture, to add one more to the long roll of mysteries of the sea.' The conclusions were almost standard issue protecting the interests of the shipowners.

    ReplyDelete