wikipedia:
'Adelaide Steamship Company was liquidated and reconstructed twice for more efficient and profitable operation, first in 1900, and subsequently in 1920.'
The Advertiser (Adelaide) Thursday 17 September, 1903.
THE ADELAIDE STEAMSHIP
COMPANY.
ANNUAL MEETING.
A PROSPEROUS CONCERN.
The sixth general meeting of shareholders
in the Adelaide Steamship Company was
held at the company offices in Currie
street on Wednesday morning, When Mr.
James Harvey (chairman of directors)
presided over a large attendance.
In moving the adoption of the report and
balance-sheet, the Chairman said he hoped
the shareholders would think the balance
sheet was satisfactory in view of the
depression which existed in shipping
generally, the result of the termination
of the South African War, and the effects
of the prolonged drought in Australia.
The gross amount of steam tonnage owned
by the company was 53,283 tons, and they would
readily understand that a close and careful
watch had to be kept in order to see
that with their larger fleet and extended
business their expenditure did not unduly
increase.
Since the inauguration of the Commonwealth
(1 January, 1901) they had had to pay duty
upon all stores required for their steamers' use,
which, of course, added considerably to the expenses,
and they had not been able relatively to increase their
rates to cover that expenditure. In Great Britain
all vessels trading on the coastline were liable
to pay duty on stores, but the tax was
heavier on Australian shipowners, seeing
that, as most of their stores were imported,
paints, oils, ship and engine stores, now
cost them a great deal more than formerly.
The reports received from their superintendent
engineer regarding the two new passenger
steamers were eminently satisfactory, and he
spoke highly of the workmanship. They might
expect any day to hear the result of the trial trip
of the Yongala, which steamer had been fixed
outward with passengers, via the Cape, en route
to Australia.
The volume of traffic during last
year had been fairly well maintained, but
freights generally were lower. In connection
with that, he might mention that some
of their friends were in such a hurry to
take advantage of the fall, that, without
calling for tenders (a practice they had
previously, assured them they
would not depart from) they fixed up a
contract some months before their existing
contract fell in, and consequently lost
the advantage of competition, and a further
drop in freights at a later stage.
They would observe that of late frequent
reference had been made to their shipping by
the press, politicians, and others, and some
of the shareholders might have marvelled
that they made no reply; but it must be
borne in mind that the company was not a
political organisation, but merely a trading company,
and the directors did not wish to get involved in a
newspaper controversy. Many of the statements were
made by interested persons who had axes
to grind, and consequently their utterances
must be discounted.
Among other things it had been said that the
company opposed the construction of the railway
between Western Australia and South Australia,
but neither actively nor passively had that been done.
They purposed entering into possession of the new
buildings on October 1, and the directors
hoped to have the pleasure of seeing the
shareholders on the afternoon of that day
to inspect the building, and partake of refreshments.
Mr. Gibb seconded, and the motion was
carried.
The report stated:
The directors herewith present their report and
balance-sheet, which, owing to the alteration in
the articles of association agreed to at the last
annual meeting, cover a period of 13 months
ended June 30 last. The balance at credit of profit
and loss, after payment of interim dividend,
providing for depreciation, repairs, and renewals,
and adding to insurance account, is £34,604 11/11.
A dividend of 5/ per share was paid on February
25 last, and a similar dividend has been declared
payable after the general meeting,
The fleet during the year has been augmented by
the purchase of the steamer Nardoo, of 2,007 tons
gross register, just off the stocks, which vessel
arrived in Australia in November last, the steamer
White Heather, acquired for towing and tendering purposes,
at Sydney, and the barque Copeland as a coal hulk at Albany.
The two passengers' steamers Yongala and Grantala,
referred to in the last report, are rapidly approaching
completion at Newcastle-on-Tyne, and, according to
latest advises, the first should leave England in September,
and the other about six weeks later.
Your directors have to report the loss of the steamer
Karawcera in July of last year, through stranding in
the Fitzroy River, near Rockhampton. The Mintaro
grounded in Moreton Bay in October last, and sustained
considerable damage.
Other minor accidents occurred, but in no case was there loss
of life or injury to passengers or crews. The contractors for
the building in Currie-street hope to hand over the premises
shortly, and, the business of the company will be carried on in the new
offices from October 1 next. A suitable berthing accommodation
could not be secured at all times for the company's vessels
at Port Pirie, an interest was acquired in the Federal Wharf
recently constructed, and has proved advantageous
in carrying on the company's operations there.
With a view to conserving the coal trade of the
company, your directors deemed it advisable to
secure an interest in a coal property in the Maitland
district, near Newcastle, New South Wales.
The fleet and plant have been well maintained, and
are in an efficient condition throughout. Your
directors regret to record the death of Mr. J. B.
Spence, who for many years occupied a seat on
the board. Mr. T. E. Barr Smith was appointed
to the Agency.
The retiring directors (Messrs. James
Harvey and H. C. E. Muecke) were
re-elected. The retiring auditors
(Messrs. Woodforde and Dalton)
were also re-elected and their fees
were fixed at 115 guineas each.
The Hon. H. W. Thompson moved a vote
of thanks to the directors, manager, secretary,
and the staff for the manner in which
they had carried on the company's operations
during the past year. The work, in
spite of all the difficulties and opposition
that had been encountered, showed careful
management on the part of the officers.
From his knowledge of shipping, and being
constantly on board the ships, he could say
that there had been nothing done in the
direction of starving the fleet in order to
secure a dividend. Everything had been
carefully kept in thorough efficiency and
everything was up to date. He was confident
that the dividend which had been declared
had been fairly earned. (Cheers.)
The Chairman briefly responded on behalf of the directors.
Mr. E. Northcote (general manager), in
responding on behalf of the executive officers,
said he really thought the Australian
Commonwealth possessed a coastal
mercantile marine second to none in
the world both in regard to ships and crews.
They had quite the most modern type
of boats trading on their coastline, and
possessed a more frequent service than
prevailed in any other part of the world.
Their ships were well maintained.
Although legislation was more
stringent, and they were put to a considerable
amount of expense, they should not
complain, because they knew that it was
in the public interest that that was done.
Not that they required to be looked after,
but it showed the public that they were
safeguarded. Australians should be proud
of their mercantile marine, and do all in
their power to foster it. (Cheers)
My impression of the Adelaide Steamship Company is that of shipowners who had flirted with bankrupcy in 1901 and a mere 2 years later, despite a depression in the shipping industry and drought, were splashing out on extravagant offices and awaiting the opulently appointed steamers Yongala and Grantala.
The smooth talking included 'careful watch had to be kept in order to see that with their larger fleet and extended business their expenditure did not unduly increase.' This suggests a response to murmurings among shareholders about extravagances. Plenty of excuses, many justifiable, were offered as explanation for the lean dividends.
Clearly the planned rail link had potential to put a large dent in cargo transportation by coastal steamers. I am sure the Adelaide Steamship Company was opposed to such an enterprise, whether they admitted to it publicly or not.
As for the shipowners' 'ring', those who had pulled out, including the Lunds of the Blue Anchor Line, one could hardly refer to as 'friends'. The following extract broadens the issue:
The smooth talking included 'careful watch had to be kept in order to see that with their larger fleet and extended business their expenditure did not unduly increase.' This suggests a response to murmurings among shareholders about extravagances. Plenty of excuses, many justifiable, were offered as explanation for the lean dividends.
Clearly the planned rail link had potential to put a large dent in cargo transportation by coastal steamers. I am sure the Adelaide Steamship Company was opposed to such an enterprise, whether they admitted to it publicly or not.
As for the shipowners' 'ring', those who had pulled out, including the Lunds of the Blue Anchor Line, one could hardly refer to as 'friends'. The following extract broadens the issue:
The Argus (Melbourne) Friday 4 December, 1903.
The shipping ring in the Anglo-Australian trade
has lasted a long time, and on the whole, it has
worked smoothly, giving Australian importers
freights fixed for considerable periods - a steady
condition of affairs, which has served interests
better than frequently fluctuating and competitive
rates. Possibly, however, the ring rates have been
too lucrative for owners and brokers, to the dis-
advantage of the Australian import trade. But
should the two threatened seccesions from the
ring take place, a cutting of rates may be expected
which will seriously effect the value of spot stocks
of heavy low priced articles.
The lines desiring to withdraw are the Lund and
Aberdeen, which together take, roughly speaking,
one fourth of the Anglo-Australian shipping trade.
The owner of the Lund line, Mr. William Lund,
started with one steamer, and was taken into the ring.
As opportunity offered he with assistance, added other
vessels. His notice of withdrawal has given great umbrage,
as he made his way under the ring to a leading position in it.
The lines desiring to withdraw are the Lund and
Aberdeen, which together take, roughly speaking,
one fourth of the Anglo-Australian shipping trade.
The owner of the Lund line, Mr. William Lund,
started with one steamer, and was taken into the ring.
As opportunity offered he with assistance, added other
vessels. His notice of withdrawal has given great umbrage,
as he made his way under the ring to a leading position in it.
The owners of the Aberdeen Line, Messrs. George
Thomson and Co, have long held a front place in
the trade. They are now arranging to send their
steamers to Brisbane, a measure which probably
in some way will interfere with the plans of the
British India Company.
Should a war of rates take place, considerable losses
will be inflicted all round, and a settlement would
largely depend upon the staying powers of the
competitors. The ability of the ring to fight has
possibly been weakened of late by the gradual
disappearance from the trade of sailing vessels,
the great bulk of British exports now being carried
by steamers. The issue of a struggle would greatly
depend upon the degree of efficiency
competitors. The ability of the ring to fight has
possibly been weakened of late by the gradual
disappearance from the trade of sailing vessels,
the great bulk of British exports now being carried
by steamers. The issue of a struggle would greatly
depend upon the degree of efficiency
of the respective lines, and it is to be noted that
both the Aberdeen and Lund lines give great
satisfaction to shippers.
This extract is a fascinating insight into the changes taking place within the Australian shipping industry, including progress in the form of steamers. Free market forces were starting to interfere with the status quo monopoly.
The Lunds had betrayed the advantages gained and, in the opinion of the press, were ungrateful. Breaking free of the 'ring' no doubt allowed owners such as the Lunds to negotiate independent tariffs for shippers, undercutting the 'ring' and sustainable through a large, efficient fleet.
The Lunds had betrayed the advantages gained and, in the opinion of the press, were ungrateful. Breaking free of the 'ring' no doubt allowed owners such as the Lunds to negotiate independent tariffs for shippers, undercutting the 'ring' and sustainable through a large, efficient fleet.
No comments:
Post a Comment